Archives - Regards sur nos publications

Cette page présente par ordre de parution les débats et les analyses suscités par les publications scientifiques des chercheur-e-s du CERI au cours du trimestre.
Vous y trouverez, entre autres, des entretiens, vidéos, podcasts et comptes rendus qui contribuent à prolonger et à enrichir la réflexion développée dans ces travaux.
Toutes ces ressources sont librement accessibles en ligne, sauf les recensions parues dans des revues à comité de lecture.
Au-delà de cette page,
la liste complète des publications scientifiques.

In Cosmopolitanism in Hard Times, Vincenzo Cicchelli and Sylvie Mesure (Eds), Leiden & Boston, Brill Publishers, 2021.
‘I speak ... as a fellow citizen of the world’ (Obama, 2008). These were the words used by Barack Obama in Berlin in July 2008 during his first presidential campaign. If he explicitly echoed another very well-known assertion, that of President Kennedy ‘Ich bin ein Berliner,’ Obama seems here a cosmopolitan candidate. This interpretation relies not only on his own life, which is, to a certain extent, cosmopolitan; his father was Kenyan and he spent part of his childhood in Indonesia. He also elaborates his speeches by referring to this cosmopolitan tradition of thought (Hammack, 2010). In fact, his election generated hope not only in the United States but also in the rest of the world. This first black man who accessed to the highest political responsibility of the country embodies a cosmopolitan president. Peoples felt that his presidency would be as beneficial to Americans as to the nationals of other countries. The Nobel Peace Prize he received shortly after his enthronement strengthened such feeling. Indeed, Barack Obama would be a Kantian in the Oval Office (Selzer, 2010)...
Autour de la publication
Entretiens du CERI
29 janvier 2021
Penser l’hégémonie dans le monde contemporain
Entretien avec Frédéric Ramel, par Miriam Périer
Is There a Possible Dialogue Between Hegemony and Cosmopolitanism?
Interview with Frédéric Ramel, by Miriam Périer

Ariel Colonomos et Richard Beardsworth (dir.)
Plausible Norms of Warfare: Reducing the Gap Between the Normative and the Empirical
European Review of International Studies, 7 (2-3), Brill, décembre 2020.
This special issue argues in favor of a new approach to the study of norms of warfare, which combines a normative analysis of ethical problems arising in war with an explanatory analysis of the use of force. Norms of warfare go as far back as Antiquity, and their study has followed a long historical path. In recent years, the ethics of war, mostly grounded in philosophy, has considerably expanded as a field. Notwithstanding such efforts to refine our normative knowledge of what should be just norms for the use of force, we argue that a more interdisciplinary approach is required to orient the study of the laws of war. In this Special Issue, proposals are made that, along with normative analysis, bring to the discussion not only disciplines such as political science and international relations, but also social theory, psychology and the neurosciences. We argue from a non-ideal perspective, that in order for norms to be just, they need to be ‘plausible’ for those who should abide by them. They also need to make sense in the context of democratic societies that favor a pluralistic debate on justice and ethics. Epistemically, we argue that, in order to understand if norms are plausible and just, reducing the gap between the normative and the empirical is required.
Autour de la publication
Entretiens du CERI
04 janvier 2021
Plausible Norms of Warfare
Interview with Richard Beardsworth, by Christian Lequesne and François Rocchi