Animal Rights: slow but definite progress

To mark International Animal Rights Day 2018, we take a look back over an interview with Regis Bismuth, professor at the Sciences Po Law School and co-editor of Sensibilité animale. Perspectives juridiques (CNRS Editions)* for an overview of advances in animal rights.

The need to end animal suffering has become a major topic of public debate. Scientific experiments, bullfighting and foie gras have all come under insistent criticism. Videos denouncing the conditions in which animals are made to live and die are widely circulated. Veganism, which still had an extremely limited following a few years ago, is gaining in popularity. So what is the law contributing to this environment?

In 2015, the French Civil Code was amended to recognise animals as a “living beings endowed with sensitivity” and no longer as a “movable property”. Is this an important step forward for animal rights?

Yes and no. What people have retained from the new article of the Civil Code (515-14) is the first part, namely that animals “are living beings endowed with sensibility”. Less attention is paid to the second part, which states that “conditional on compliance with the laws that protect them, (they) are subject to the property regime”. So in fact, animals’ legal protection depends mainly on other branches of law, which means that the part this provision plays is very marginal.

What is the origin of animals’ legal status?

Animal law, in Europe at least, has been defined with regard to our relationships with animals, and not in terms of the animal itself in its subjectivity. Animal rights can be traced back to the Cruel Treatment of Cattle Act, also known as Martin’s Act, adopted in 1822 in England to prohibit acts of cruelty against livestock. It was progress but remained limited to one category of animals. In France, the Grammont Act of 1850 was the first to deal with animal protection by penalising their mistreatment in public. But in this case, it was the public’s sensitivity that was targeted and not animals’ suffering.

It took more than a century for the law to be changed—in 1959—and for mistreatment in private to be punishable by law. Since then, laws to protect animals have been developing steadily, adding animal welfare to the prevention of cruelty. But it is clear that the legislation is still essentially determined by the use we make of animals.

What do you mean by “use” of animals?

To understand properly, you have to consider the animal categories established by law. Farm animals are those destined for “the production of food, wool, hides or other agricultural purposes”. The other categories are pets, recreational animals, and even pests. The economic stakes behind these categories are high, and not just for the agri-food industry. Think, for example, of animals used for scientific experiments or for sports activities.

Are there other issues that come into play?

Yes, many, and they’re often interconnected, but the economy is almost always in the background. Take the debate over bullfighting. Defenders of bullfighting talk first of all about culture and tradition. But they also talk about the revenue and jobs that bullfights generate through cattle rearing and tourism. Another example—which is interesting because it is the subject of legal battles between Canada and Europe—is seal products. In Europe, the sale of seal products is prohibited unless they come from traditional hunting. Canada challenged this ban through the World Trade Organisation, which, on the whole, sided with Europe. However, Canada’s arguments were not unreasonable. Among other things, they pointed to the fact that Europe authorises other, more questionable practices, such as raising pigs in conditions far worse than those of seals, which live in their natural habitat. It’s an important example because it shows that our relationship to animals is different from one place to another. It’s also interesting for the fact that it brings living conditions into play and not only conditions of slaughter.

And what about in EU law? Are animals’ living conditions a concern?

Yes, but on the sidelines. For example, the size of battery cages for chickens is going to be set by EU law to make them bigger. But even as EU law establishes the principle of animal welfare, it provides for exceptions concerning religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage. Of course, all this can change because lawmakers also listen to public opinion.

Yet public opinion tends to pick and choose its causes of indignation.

Public opinion is multi-faceted and is also evolving. Emotion plays an essential role. People are more easily appalled by the suffering inflicted on “cute” animals, or on those deemed noble, such as horses, or intelligent, such as whales. Another factor that counts is closeness to humans. Take laboratory animals, for instance. The suffering of rats that are experimented on to advance our well-being is tolerated better than when experiments are performed on apes. Moreover, EU law heavily limits testing on apes on the grounds that apes demonstrate social behaviour extremely similar to that of humans. But English philosopher Jeremy Bentham disputed the admissibility of intelligence as a criterion at the end of the eighteenth century. He wrote that to merit protection, the question was not whether a being is capable of reason or speech, but whether it can suffer. Otherwise, he argued, we could very well allow ourselves to inflict suffering on infants given that they do not talk or think.

The struggle for animal welfare keeps getting wider...

Absolutely. There’s the issue of circus animals, for example. In a number of European countries, wild animals are banned in circuses and some local councils in France are taking similar measures. Moreover, the circus world is catching on and one of its major figures, André-Joseph Bouglione, has decided to stop using animals in his shows. Dolphinariums are also concerned. A 2017 decree prohibited the reproduction, trade and import of orcas and dolphins. Though it was called into question by the Conseil d’Etat last January, we must not lose sight of the fact that this movement is inevitable. Some of the issues raised are more unexpected, such as glue mousetraps, which have been banned in Ireland. A new law has also been passed in Switzerland stipulating that certain crustaceans must be stunned before being placed in boiling water.

So some significant advances have been set down in law?

Yes, and we’ll see more progress through this sort of initiative than through the Civil Code. Incidentally, this is the observation that led students from the “Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation” programme at the Sciences Po Law School clinic to conduct a project on animal welfare labelling. The idea is to more effectively regulate the information that appears on products. Progress also owes much to animal welfare associations. They sometimes use questionable methods but to their credit, they have brought certain practices into the public eye and, in the end, have moved the debate forward.

*Régis Bismuth, Fabien Marchadier, Sensibilité animale. Perspectives juridiques (Animal Sensitivity. Legal Perspectives), CNRS Éditions, June 2015
 
Find out more
Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Gender Equality in Politics

Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Gender Equality in Politics

Following the recent launch of the Certificate for Gender Equality, or “Certificat egalité femmes-hommes” at Sciences Po, the Founder and Executive Director of the Women and Public Policy Program (WAPPP) at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, Victoria Budson, came to lecture on women in U.S. politics. She was joined by Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, former French Minister of Women’s Affairs, and first French woman to be appointed Minister of Education and Research.

More
HeForShe: Universities & Corporations Hand In Hand

HeForShe: Universities & Corporations Hand In Hand

Sciences Po joined the HeforShe movement in June 2015, when Frédéric Mion became the only IMPACT 10x10x10 champion at a French university. On the 3rd April 2019, Sciences Po hosted a HeforShe panel discussion with various champions to talk about change at an institutional level, share the progress made, and pass on the baton to the younger generation in the battle for gender equality. 

More
The Art and Success of Sciences Po's Debate Team

The Art and Success of Sciences Po's Debate Team

Sciences Po students love to debate, and therefore it is no surprise that Sciences Po has numerous debate clubs, workshops, and even a debate team. What is perhaps more surprising is that the Sciences Po Debate team debates in English, using British Parliamentary style. This year, for the 26th Edition of the annual French Debating Association Tournament, Sciences Po made it all the way to the finals - losing against the Ecole Polytechnique. 

More
Talent meets Opportunity at the 2019 European Internships Forum

Talent meets Opportunity at the 2019 European Internships Forum

Every year, Sciences Po students interested in European internships or careers have the opportunity to attend the European Internships Forum which takes place in Brussels, jointly organized by Sciences Po, LSE (London School of Economics), and the College of Europe. Watch the video to see what students gained from the internship fair. 

More
10 years, 100 startups

10 years, 100 startups

Over 100 startups incubated, 1,000 businesses created, annual sales turnovers of tens of millions of euros, and resales worth hundreds of millions...These are the outstanding results of the Sciences Po Incubator on its 10th birthday, celebrated this year. 

It was a pioneering scheme whose structure was one of the very first to be created at a university in the field of social sciences and humanities. We take a look back at the incubator over its 10 years with Maxime Marzin, Head of the Centre for Entrepreneurship at Sciences Po, who helped to set it up. More

Poitiers: 5 Surprising Things About Our New Campus

Poitiers: 5 Surprising Things About Our New Campus

Since 2001 Sciences Po has had a campus in Poitiers, but the undergraduate college was pushed for space at the Hôtel Chaboureau. There was a 15% increase in students in the space of 5 years, with the attractiveness of the Latin-American programme making new premises necessary. This became a reality in September 2018 at the heart of a new site built in the 18th century and reinvented for the 21st. Watch the guided tour on the occasion of the official inauguration which takes places on Wednesday, 10th April.

More
Furthering Collaboration With The University of Cambridge

Furthering Collaboration With The University of Cambridge

Earlier this week, Sciences Po welcomed Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge, Professor Stephen Toope, who came to exchange with President Frédéric Mion about the current partnership and collaboration between the two universities. A new Memorandum of Understanding was signed to further strengthen collaboration at the research and doctoral levels.

More