Methodological ressources for literature reviews

Methodological ressources for literature reviews

 LIEPP promotes interdisciplinary literature reviews as a tool for public policy evaluation.

Several sessions of its METHEVAL seminar have been devoted to this issue, and a section of its calls for projects is dedicated to funding interdisciplinary literature reviews.
This page aims to bring together and make accessible methodological resources for conducting different types of literature reviews in order to facilitate this practice.
  • What Review is Right for You?

This tool is designed to provide guidance and supporting material to reviewers on methods for the conduct and reporting of knowledge synthesis.

Right Review : https://rightreview.knowledgetranslation.net/

  • The scoping review

"The scoping review" or "mapping review" is a more recent approach. Its objective is to take a rapid stock of knowledge on a subject (scientific research and/or other types of literature). [The exploratory literature review remains above all a work of identification research, essentially descriptive in nature, with broader inclusion criteria than a systematic review.

Methodological note by Chloé Mour

  • The systematic literature review

"A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question. It uses explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view to minimizing bias, thus providing more reliable findings from which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made" (Antman 1992, Oxman 1993)

Belaïd, Loubna and Valéry Ridde, "Une cartographie de quelques méthodes de revues systématiques", Ceped Working Paper, n°44, Ceped (UMR 196 Université de Paris IRD, ERL 1244 Inserm), Paris, March 2020.

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Back to top