Are far right parties a threat to the European Union?

In recent years, far right parties in Europe have seemed to be inexorably gaining ground. Is the European Union poised to close itself off completely? Not necessarily.

Because with strong disparities from one country to another and a situation much more complex than it looks, Europeans seem to be asking both for more openness… and more protection. Caterina Froio, VOX-Pol research fellow at the University of Oxford, and Nonna Mayer, CNRS researcher at Sciences Po’s Centre d’études européennes, explain.

Populism is on the rise in several European countries. What is this a sign of?

Nonna Mayer: Populism is a fuzzy concept. If we define it simply as a rejection of the elite, we could currently label as populist the 79 percent of French citizens who think that those who govern us “do not care what people like us think” or the 75 percent who think the political class is “somewhat corrupt”! I’ll limit myself to the “Populist Radical Right” parties that have developed in Europe over the last three decades, whose anti-elite stands are coloured by nativism, authoritarianism and ethnocentrism, as Cas Mudde has shown. In spite of their diversity, these parties share a common claim to defend the “losers of globalisation”, and they frame this globalisation as a triple threat: economic (immigrants take our jobs), cultural (they do not respect our values) and political (the sovereignty of the nation state is at risk). Despite their differences, they cut through the old party cleavages based on religion and class to form a new family of parties that is here to stay. This family challenges the old Lefts and the old Rights and the European integration process they have supported—an EU seen as an open door to migrants and a major threat to national identities.
 
Caterina Froio: I share Nonna’s interpretation regarding globalisation, but I would add an extra layer to it. I believe that Europe is experiencing a specific form of populism, combined with an ethnocentrism that has gained support by striving to redefine who the “native people” are. Parties that combine strong anti-immigrant and anti-establishment rhetoric seem to profit most from current societal changes, and these are the “radical right populist parties”. One likely explanation for their rise is the crisis of the nation-state model due to globalisation. In nation-states, a cultural identity (the nation) was combined with a political entity (the State). Globalisation processes reshape this equation since they bring increasing levels of economic, cultural and political interconnectedness between different individuals and states. In this sense, globalisation challenges the pillars of the populist radical right’s identity: nativism, nationalism and cultural homogeneity. Therefore, radical right populists oppose globalisation, portraying it as a triple “threat to the native people” in cultural, economic, and political terms. 

Is the European democratic model itself being called into question?

Nonna Mayer: I would disconnect the two things, European Union and democracy. A survey in 2013 explored European citizens’ attitudes towards democracy. The results showed a strong commitment to democracy, equality before the law, and free and fair elections as the first requisites. But they also highlighted a large gap between what democracy should be and what it was in practice in their country. The most satisfied with how their democracies worked were the Northern Europeans, followed by Western Europeans, with Southern and Central-Eastern Europeans lagging behind. As for the EU, it rated even worse. The general public hardly sees it as a model of democracy, but rather as a distant bureaucratic machine with complex, nit-picking regulations, far removed from citizens’ everyday needs and problems. Yet even after Brexit—maybe all the more after Brexit—as shown by a comparative poll conducted in six European countries, a clear majority of citizens judge their belonging to the EU as positive, and only a minority is willing to abandon the Euro. So they don’t reject democracy, they want more of it, done better!
 
Caterina Froio: Unlike “far right” organisations that oppose democracy and advocate authoritarian or totalitarian orders (like Fascism or Nazism), most “populist radical right parties” comply with the formal procedures of representative democracy. In this sense, they do not challenge democratic procedures although they criticize electoral outcomes. Yet the fact that radical right populist parties respect the procedures of democracy does not mean that their way of interpreting democracy is in line with a liberal democratic understanding. As suggested by Cas Mudde in his 2007 book, the unresolvable tension between the populist radical right and liberal democracy lies in different ways of envisaging society. Most populist radical right parties consider society as mainly, but not exclusively, homogeneous in cultural terms. Liberal democracy instead encompasses and presupposes groups that are very different. In this sense, there is little doubt that populist radical rightists challenge the democratic model itself in Europe and, when they exist, abroad.

While the far right is gaining ground in certain countries, such as France, Austria and Italy, other European countries are not being affected in the same way. Why not? What can we learn from this?

Nonna Mayer: It reflects social and political idiosyncracies. Germany for instance was for a long time immunised against a return of the far right by the memory of the Holocaust. With the exception of the short-lived emergence of the Republikaner in the 1990s, it’s only now that an eurosceptic, populist far right party like Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) is enjoying electoral success. As for the rest of Europe, there seems to be a North-South cleavage. Populist radical right parties have a larger following in the better-off, long-established Northern democracies, while radical left parties are more successful in Southern countries (Spain, Greece), which have been far more severely hit by the recession and the austerity policies of the EU. But maybe because they only recently emerged from authoritarian regimes, their revolt inclines them more towards the radical left than the radical right.
 
Caterina Froio: I believe that what matters is how open mainstream parties are to the ideas of the populist radical right, and how they frame their opposition/position. On the one hand, many left- and right-wing mainstream parties have started "speaking to the people", but rather than addressing their needs and hopes, they have primarily fuelled their fears. In so doing, they have offered fertile ground to populist radical right arguments, radicalising mainstream values. On the other hand, mainstream parties all too often compete with populist radical right parties on a near moralistic basis, reducing their discourse to an anti-far-right agenda. The result is that while mainstream parties converge on an anti-populist radical right agenda, populist radical right parties themselves can appear to be the ones with clear alternative proposals. Let’s not forget, for example, that UK internal politics set up the Conservative Party to allow the referendum! If there’s something we can learn, it’s that counter discourses are essential. The pro-EU camp should react by changing—radically changing—the political direction of the EU. The community project is facing a structural crisis that’s been decades in the making, which EU intelligentsia has tackled with slogans like “more Europe”. These sound empty for most European citizens who have suffered from austerity measures. The situation is unsustainable, and it will become worse if countermeasures are not taken in terms of fiscal union and European welfare services. Let's hope that Brexit will at least serve as a lesson in this sense.
 

Related links

"Students are dreamers and they should be dreamers"

Former Minister of the Interior of Germany, Thomas de Maizière, and former Prime Minister of France, Bernard Cazeneuve were invited by the Sciences Po School of Public Affairs to discuss the fight against terrorism at the German, French, and European levels.

More
A new master's in luxury marketing

A new master's in luxury marketing

Starting in September 2019, the School of Management and Innovation is launching a new Master’s degree in marketing entitled “New Luxury & Art de Vivre.” Taught entirely in English, the aim of this new programme is to train high-level marketing managers to specifically master luxury and French art de vivre, with a refined understanding of the sector thanks to a strong background in the social sciences and a clear strategic vision of the new trends in that sector - digitalization and a drive towards social responsibility and sustainability issues.

More
CORE: A different way to study economics

CORE: A different way to study economics

In recent years, students and teachers alike have come to realize that there is an insufficient culture and knowledge of economics in our society. The study of economics and the reality of how our world operates differ enormously. This realization led to the creation of CORE, a new course and manual developed by professors of economics from around the world, including Yann Algan at Sciences Po. The goal of this course: to show that economic tools, often considered too abstract and theoretical, can help solve real-world problems and crises.

More
Why choose Sciences Po?

Why choose Sciences Po?

Felix is an exchange student from Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda. Nearing the end of his year abroad, he answered a few questions regarding why he chose Sciences Po. Felix hopes to return to Sciences Po to pursue a Master's in journalism. Find out what he calls the "richesse" or wealth of Sciences Po in this video. 

More
Artillerie: discover our future campus!

Artillerie: discover our future campus!

A new chapter in Sciences Po’s history is beginning. The redevelopment project chosen for the Artillerie site acquired in late 2016 has been unveiled: it is the work of the team led by Sogelym Dixence with architect Jean-Michel Wilmotte. Beyond the architectural challenge of transforming a seventeenth-century novitiate into a sustainable, innovative university campus, this plan represents a complete renewal of Sciences Po after 150 years of existence.

More
How far can Europe push back its borders?

How far can Europe push back its borders?

Migration control is now “high politics” in Europe and a priority for the EU. For example, on May 2, 2018, the European Commission proposed that the budget for the management of external borders, migration and asylum – set at 13 billion euros for the period 2014-2020 – be raised to 34.9 billion euros.

More