What do the rich think of the poor?

How do the upper and upper-middle classes living in wealthy neighborhoods see the poor and working classes? How do they explain the differences between themselves and the most destitute?

Do they perceive the latter as a danger, a social problem or an injustice to fix? To answer these questions, four sociologists, including CEE assistant professor Bruno Cousin, conducted in-depth interviews to compare three cities generally perceived as very different: Paris, São Paulo and Delhi. They presented their results in a book: Ce que les riches pensent des pauvres (What the rich think of the poor; Seuil, 2017). Interview with Bruno Cousin, originally published in Cogito N°4, Sciences Po's Research Newsletter.

Why is it important to know what the rich think of the poor?

To really understand inequalities and poverty one must also look at how they are perceived by the people who most benefit from the current state of distribution of diverse resources: the upper classes. They have a disproportionate influence in terms of individual and collective decisions – from ordinary choices on housing, school and employment issues to political positions – that contribute to the perpetuation or aggravation of inequalities, and to the generous or repressive character of antipoverty policies. The upper classes also play an important role in the dissemination of representations and of various types of arguments underlying the stigmatization of the poor. By more or less explicitly expressing judgments on what is morally respectable, culturally distinctive and economically valid with respect to the poor, they can either deepen and entrench social boundaries, or conversely erase or shift them.

Why did you study three cities as different as Paris, São Paulo and Delhi?

The three cities chosen for the study (we conducted 80 in-depth interviews in each of them among the upper and upper-middle classes living in the most exclusive neighborhoods) are the most important metropolises of three major democracies. Indeed, interviews on these subjects in a country with an authoritarian regime would have been more complicated (we would have faced more refusals to participate in the study and self-censorship). However, besides the commonalities, these are three very different countries in terms of welfare regime, level of inequality and recent evolution of the latter (see the World Inequality Report 2018). Therefore, any common points that might emerge from the comparison of these cases would most likely be generalizable.

The upper classes’ concern with preserving a certain “moral order” that is specific to them is visibly a structuring element in their relationships to the poor or the poorer than them…

What first emerges from the study is the fact that on a daily basis the upper and upper-middle classes’ main concern in terms of self-distinction and education strategies is not to set themselves apart from the poor. This is mainly because the latter distinction is most often taken for granted. In France’s case, most working class neighborhoods are far from the wealthy ones, meaning that interaction is pretty rare. Our respondents were more concerned with differentiating themselves from the upper-middle and middle classes closer to them, and in relation to whom they seek to assert their superior status and maintain their advantages. For reasons both identity-based and strategic in terms of social reproduction, they would like their children, for instance, to grow up in neighborhoods and attend schools that “are the right match”, and they define the social class with which they identify or to which they aspire and hold as a model in a very elitist and restrictive way. However, the rare occasions when this local moral order is effectively “threatened” by the prospect of intermixing with the working classes elicit the most peremptory and strong reactions. This was particularly the case with the plan to build a shelter in the 16th arrondissement of Paris and, in Delhi, with the idea to force  elite schools to integrate by taking in students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

These residents of wealthy neighborhoods then seek to avoid the poor and shield themselves from them. Why?

Besides the dynamics of affinity and homophily-based aggregation, respondents also mentioned reasons that were more explicitly driven by repulsion towards the poor. They seek to protect themselves from interactions with the working classes when they appear to threaten their lifestyle or, as is most often the case in the cities we studied, appear to jeopardize their physical or health safety. While each of three cities exhibits a stigmatization of the poor in terms of physical danger and hygiene violations, they did not do so to the same extent. Parisian respondents did not consider the poor to be as dangerous and filthy as respondents in São Paulo, where rates and levels of violence are admittedly particularly high, including from the police. Similarly, the representation of the poor as filthy, potentially sick and disorderly, and as marring the city, is more pronounced and recurrent in Delhi. The relationship to public spaces is also different in each of the three cities: affluent Parisians regularly visit and use them, but would like to see the bourgeoisie’s norms of politeness and urbanity imposed everywhere; wealthy Delhi residents take for granted that they can only frequent ones in a few carefully selected neighborhoods that they navigate according to a secure routine; meanwhile, their counterparts in São Paulo often see themselves  as besieged by a ubiquitous threat and keep to private spaces.

Do these representations undermine social solidarity?

One of the book’s chapters focuses on the way in which the residents of wealthy neighborhoods explain poverty and come up with “solutions” to it. A rhetoric denouncing the inherited, and thus largely irremediable character of the poor’s predicament most often combines with arguments accusing the latter of failing to remedy their situation themselves… This articulation between the naturalization of poverty and blaming of the poor can translate into portraying the poor’s purported propensity for sloth as a hereditary streak that they are also guilty of failing to resist. In Paris, where the vast majority of respondents spontaneously mention the social determinants of poverty and consider it obvious that children do not all have the same opportunities and chances to succeed, they nevertheless assert that adults who remain poor lack the willpower to overcome their condition. Thus, the interviews display criticisms of the welfare state that are characteristic of the reactionary rhetoric. For the respondents, assistance for the poor often: is futile because it has no real effect on the issue it seeks to resolve;  is perverse because it is a disincentive for individuals effort; and/or is detrimental to balancing public finances, and therefore might jeopardize the State itself… So yes, definitely: none of this is conducive to solidarity.

Bruno Cousin, assistant professor at Sciences Po’s Centre for European Studies and Comparative Politics, is a sociologist. His research focuses on class relations and inequalities, urban segregation, forms of sociability and elite legitimation processes.

More information

  • This article was originally published in the 4th issue of Cogito, the Sciences Po Research Newsletter, focus on Education & Inequalities.
Le migrant est l’avenir du monde

Le migrant est l’avenir du monde

Par Bertrand Badie (CERI). Le débat sur la migration est stupéfiant et pourtant il dure, s’enlise et même s’encastre dans l’ordinaire de notre culture politique contemporaine. Il paralyse l’Europe qui en parle tout le temps, mais n’en délibère jamais. Il envahit les propagandes partisanes et s’impose comme une sorte de friandise électorale dont se délectent les populistes de tous poils, de droite et maintenant d’une certaine gauche. Il tétanise les gouvernements qui craignent que le respect de la vérité ou qu’un sursaut d’humanisme ne leur vaillent une chute dans les sondages.

Lire la suite
“L’écosystème français des startups est fascinant !”

“L’écosystème français des startups est fascinant !”

Le 11 octobre dernier, les équipes de Station F intervenaient devant les étudiants de Sciences Po pour leur parler de la vie au sein de l'incubateur parisien, l'une des plus grandes pépinières de startups du monde. La directrice de Station F, Roxanne Varza, diplômée de Sciences Po, a notamment insisté sur la richesse des possibilités offertes par l'écosystème français aux entrepreneurs qui veulent se lancer, Paris demeurant injustement sous-estimée dans le monde de la tech. Elle a aussi présenté la "méthode Station F" pour révéler le potentiel des créateurs d'entreprises. Entretien. 

Lire la suite

"Où étiez-vous le 13 novembre ?"

À l’occasion de la Nuit du droit, un des amphithéâtres de Sciences Po s’est transformé en tribunal correctionnel. Pendant deux heures, des professionnels du droit sont venus mettre en scène la difficulté de leur quotidien. Quand la justice tente de démêler le vrai du faux, entre amour maternel et fanatisme.

Lire la suite
Nos campus en régions vous ouvrent leurs portes !

Nos campus en régions vous ouvrent leurs portes !

Vous êtes lycéen, vous voulez vous porter candidat à Sciences Po ? Enseignements, vie de campus : venez poser toutes vos questions lors des Journées Portes Ouvertes de nos campus en régions. Une occasion unique de rencontrer étudiants, professeurs et responsables pédagogiques du Collège universitaire (le 1er cycle de Sciences Po en trois ans).

Lire la suite
Sciences Po lance sa plus grande campagne de levée de fonds

Sciences Po lance sa plus grande campagne de levée de fonds

Sans le mécénat, Sciences Po n’existerait pas. Ni les fameuses Conventions Éducation Prioritaire. Depuis de nombreuses années, l’engagement des mécènes a rendu possible d’innombrables projets, notamment en matière d’innovation sociale. Sciences Po dévoile aujourd’hui la plus ambitieuse campagne de levée de fonds de son histoire. Objectif : lever 100 millions d’euros d’ici 2022, date anniversaire des 150 ans de l’institution. Et former une génération engagée, capable de comprendre et de transformer le monde de demain.

Lire la suite
Espoirs et illusions à l’heure de l’Amérique de Donald Trump

Espoirs et illusions à l’heure de l’Amérique de Donald Trump

Par Karoline Postel-Vinay (CERI). L’ouverture de l’Assemblée Générale de l’Organisation des Nations unies (ONU) offre, chaque année, l’occasion de photographier le paysage diplomatique mondial. C’est également un moment propice pour apprécier les talents théâtraux des chefs d’Etat et de gouvernement : Nikita Khrouchtchev brandissant sa chaussure en 1960, Fidel Castro et son discours-fleuve la même année, Mouammar Kadhafi déchirant la charte de l’ONU en 2009… L’enceinte des Nations unies devient alors, littéralement, une « scène » internationale où une multitude de visions du monde se rencontrent, se confrontent et s’affrontent.

Lire la suite
“Ce qui nous intéresse ? L’ouverture d’esprit !”

“Ce qui nous intéresse ? L’ouverture d’esprit !”

Chaque année, le Forum Carrières de Sciences Po offre aux étudiants et jeunes diplômés l’opportunité de préparer au mieux leur avenir professionnel. Ce vendredi 28 septembre 2018, vous avez été près de 1500 à répondre présents pour échanger avec des recruteurs. Retour en images sur ce moment fort de la rentrée.

Lire la suite
La pratique de la musique est-elle bénéfique aux écoliers ?

La pratique de la musique est-elle bénéfique aux écoliers ?

Par Philippe Coulangeon (OSC). Pour la deuxième année consécutive, en 2018, les ministres de l’Éducation nationale et de la Culture se sont associés pour une rentrée en musique dans les écoles, collèges et lycées. Comme l’année précédente, il s’agissait d’accueillir les élèves « par des chants ou des concerts afin de commencer l’année sous le signe de la joie et de la sérénité », selon les mots du communiqué de presse officiel.

Lire la suite
Les meilleures copies 2018

Les meilleures copies 2018

Commenter Le Roman inachevé de Louis Aragon, se demander si la Résistance a contribué à transformer la République, ou présenter un extrait de l’autobiographie de Simone Veil, ce sont quelques-unes des épreuves sur lesquelles ont planché les candidats à l’entrée en première année à Sciences Po en 2018. Retrouvez leurs meilleures copies.

Lire la suite