Saving money, losing lives

Analysis by David Paltiel, professor at Yale School of Public Health and a visiting professor at the Laboratory for Interdisciplinary Evaluation of Public Policies (LIEPP) at Sciences Po.

Recent cutbacks in global funding for HIV/AIDS force donor nations to confront how little they are willing to give up to save a life on another continent. For the last two decades, global assistance programmes have enjoyed robust support and remarkable success in providing HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment services in resource-limited settings.
Recently, however, there are signs of funder fatigue and mounting political resistance. In 2016, for example, donor government funding to support HIV efforts in low- and middle-income countries decreased for the second consecutive year, from US$7.5 billion to US$7 billion. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has scaled back the number of funding-eligible nations it serves. Most recently, the White House proposed a 33% cut to the US foreign aid budget, jeopardizing more than US$6.7 billion currently earmarked for HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and research.
 
These developments raise important questions for donor and recipient nations alike: What are the likely health and economic effects of reduced global investment in HIV prevention and care? How much money can be saved while maintaining existing commitments? What cost-containment options are available, how much will each option save, and what harms will it create?
 
Working with colleagues in Côte d’Ivoire and the Republic of South Africa, we addressed these questions using a mathematical simulation and publicly available data. Here, we highlight four key findings:

The economic savings will be small and short-lived

Given existing commitments to persons already receiving care for HIV infection, savings greater than 30% of current outlays are unlikely. Moreover, most of the savings will dry up with time, as the downstream costs of patient neglect and failure to reduce HIV transmission accumulate.

The health harms will be large and lasting

Whether the yardstick is mortality, life-expectancy, or new HIV transmissions, cutbacks will almost certainly produce proportionally greater harm than economic good. We estimate more than 500,000 additional HIV transmissions and 1.6 million more HIV-related deaths in South Africa over the next 10 years. In Côte d’Ivoire, HIV-related deaths could increase 35% over that period.

For recipient nations, there are better and worse responses to reduced foreign assistance. 

Policies that either delay the presentation of the healthiest patients to care or reduce investments in patient retention will do the least harm in terms of deaths, years of life lost and new HIV transmissions.

Even if recipient nations act optimally to minimize the harm to their citizens, each year of life lost in Africa due to cutbacks will save donors no more than $900.

This fourth finding – and the shocking humanitarian cost it imposes on vulnerable populations – should take your breath away. Evidence abounds that citizens of resource-rich nations, like the United States and France, will willingly pay upwards of $100,000 to save a single year of life. Does the imposition of this disparity – a year of life to save ourselves $900 – accurately reflect how we in donor countries value life in Africa?
 
Scale-back of international aid to HIV programs in resource-limited settings will reverse enormous progress made over the past 20 years in curbing HIV transmission and improving HIV-related outcomes. We have it in our power – and even within our economic reach – to stop the global AIDS epidemic in its tracks. Now is the time to redouble our efforts, not to cut back and witness the reversal of hard-earned successes.


Related links

The

The "gilets jaunes" movement is not a Facebook revolution

In less than a month, France’s gilets jaunes (yellow vests) have gone from being a celebrated example of Facebook’s ability to power a spontaneous revolution to a cautionary tale of how social networks can be manipulated by outsiders to provoke outrage and sow dissension. But in both of these extreme scenarios, the central actors lie outside France, whether it’s the platforms based in Silicon Valley or the suspected propagandists in Russia.

More
Robots will never replace journalists

Robots will never replace journalists

Artificial intelligence was the keyword at this year’s New Practices in Journalism conference. Lisa Gibbs, AI Newsroom Lead at the Associated Press, answered our questions on the promise and the risks linked to robot journalism. For Gibbs, artificial intelligence should be welcomed as a means for journalists to bypass routine daily tasks, affording them more time to focus on the mission of their field: informing the world. Watch the video.

More
Live Q&A Sessions on our Master's Programmes

Live Q&A Sessions on our Master's Programmes

This November and December, the Sciences Po undergraduate college and seven graduate schools will run a series of live Q&A sessions. Tune in live to meet current Sciences Po students and graduate school deans and ask any questions you may have about admissions, education, financial aid, career prospects, life in Paris and more!

More
Animal Rights: slow but definite progress

Animal Rights: slow but definite progress

To mark International Animal Rights Day 2018, we take a look back over an interview with Regis Bismuth, professor at the Sciences Po Law School and co-editor of Sensibilité animale. Perspectives juridiques (CNRS Editions)* for an overview of advances in animal rights.

More
This summer, experience college life at Sciences Po

This summer, experience college life at Sciences Po

Every summer, Sciences Po opens its doors to secondary school students from around the world as part of the Summer School’s Pre-College Programme. This programme is an opportunity to discover Sciences Po and experience college life and academics at one of France’s leading universities.

More
How much is tuition at Sciences Po?

How much is tuition at Sciences Po?

At Sciences Po, we believe that financial barriers should never get in the way of education. Tuition fees are relatively lower than other world-class universities as a result of our proactive social policy to be an open and inclusive university.

More
Witnessing the impact of education in Myanmar

Witnessing the impact of education in Myanmar

Thiffanie Rodriguez, a Master’s student in International Public Management at Sciences Po is passionate about education. Before finishing the last semester of her Master’s, she took a gap year to explore discrepancies in education worldwide. After an internship at the Directorate of Education of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), she completed another internship over three months in the Myanmar Country Office of the World Food Programme. Read her account of the experience.

More
A new master's in luxury marketing

A new master's in luxury marketing

Starting in September 2019, the School of Management and Innovation is launching a new Master’s degree in marketing entitled “New Luxury & Art de Vivre.” Taught entirely in English, the aim of this new programme is to train high-level marketing managers to master luxury and French art de vivre specifically, with a refined understanding of the sector thanks to a strong background in the social sciences and a clear strategic vision of the new trends in that sector: digitalization and a drive towards social responsibility and sustainability issues.

More
Gene-edited babies: China wants to be the world leader, but at what cost?

Gene-edited babies: China wants to be the world leader, but at what cost?

Recent claims of the world’s first gene-edited babies have sparked a strong response, to say the least. In particular, the Southern University of Science and Technology, which employs the researcher involved, He Jiankui, stated in a press release that they were not aware of his work, that it took place off campus, and that it was a case of potential scientific misconduct that would not go unaddressed.

More