- Enseignants / Chercheurs
- Alumni & Donateurs
- Le département
- Ressources & services
Accueil › Socioeconomic Segregation in Large Cities in France and the United States
Hugues Lagrange, Lincoln Quillian
- Actualité Sciences Po
Socioeconomic Segregation in Large Cities in France and the United States
Lincon Quillian (Northwestern University)
Hugues Lagrange (OSC)
Volume 53, Issue 4, p. 1051-1084, August 2016.
Past cross-national comparisons of socioeconomic segregation have been undercut by lack of comparability in measures, data, and concepts. Using IRIS data from the French Census of 2008 and the French Ministry of Finance as well as tract data from the American Community Survey (2006–2010) and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Picture of Subsidized Households, and constructing measures to be as similar as possible, we compare socioeconomic segregation in metropolitan areas with a population of more than 1 million in France and the United States.
We find much higher socioeconomic segregation in large metropolitan areas in the United States than in France. We also find:
- a strong pattern of low-income neighborhoods in central cities and high-income neighborhoods in suburbs in the United States, but varying patterns across metropolitan areas in France;
- that high-income persons are the most segregated group in both countries;
- that the shares of neighborhood income differences that can be explained by neighborhood racial/ethnic composition are similar in France and the United States; and
- that government-assisted housing is disproportionately located in the poorest neighborhoods in the United States but is spread across many neighborhood income levels in France. We conclude that differences in government provision of housing assistance and levels of income inequality are likely important contributing factors to the Franco-U.S. difference in socioeconomic segregation.
(...) In France, by contrast, the distribution of high- and low-income and unemployment areas varies significantly by metropolitan area. Marseille and Lille follow a U.S.-style pattern with regard to suburbanization, with a poorer city and wealthier suburbs. The suburbs of Paris and Lyon include have an elevated share of both poor and affluent neighborhoods relative to their central cities (...) In the United States, then, individual poverty is likely more often accompanied by neighborhood poverty, and individual affluence is more often accompanied by neighborhood affluence, than is the case for France (...).