- Alumni & Donors
- The CERI
- Academic cooperation
- follow us
Collective mobilizations, Globalization, Identities, Iran, Migrations, Networks, Pakistan, Religions, Theory of International Relations, Transnational actors, United Kingdom, Les Cahiers du CERI
The concept of "world community" is nowadays very commonly employed by researchers dealing with the social aspects of globalization. At the same time, the words "islam" and "umma" -be they used by medias, politicians or scholars- have sometimes assumed the existence of such a community which is supposed to link all Muslims wherever they live. This kind of approach was strongly revived during the "Rushdie affair": the transnational dimension of the protest against the writer and the very content of ayatollah Khomeini's fatwa furthered it.The starting point of this paper is to take the "world community" postulate at its word. What are we talking about ? Who speaks about it ? Under what circumstances and from which places ? How the limits of this concept can be established, or rather how can it be constructed by the observer to become useful ? These questions are addressed by examining the early stage of the anti-Rushdie protest in its worldwide dimension. It is suggested that an analysis of the understandings and strategies of the mobilized groups, of their symbolic and concrete transnational interactions, as well as a comparison between the social and political national contexts, help to identify the "interpretive community" which was formed at this juncture.
Iran, Middle East, Networks, NGOs / Civil society, Politics / Political Systems, Religions, State, Les études du CERI
Borders, Caucasus / Central Asia, Collective mobilizations, Identities, Middle East, Networks, Religions, State, Territory, Transnational actors, Les Cahiers du CERI
One of the causes of the weakness of the State in the Middle East is that prime allegiance goes to the "solidarity group" (açabiyya), a social network which is always founded on family and personal relationships. These solidarity groups either are committed to a national strategy in order to control the State or, on the contrary, become delocalised and internationalised within diasporas which create their own transnational networks. Solidarity groups are not the expression of the permanence of a traditional society within a modern State, but rather a recomposition of allegiance networks within a political space definitively modified by the existence of a State. This recomposition can take three main forms. Firstly territorial establishment and the development of a community within sub-ethnic groups competing for power: the Kulabis in Tajikistan for example. Secondly the delocalisation of power networks which fade away once their objective, the obtaining of State power, is achieved (the Samarkand faction in Uzbekistan). Finally it can be achieved by the linking to an international network, for example that of humanitarian aid. These different types of recomposition do not weaken the State as such, which remains the framework of any possible inscription in the political space. But they do hinder the transition towards an ethnic State which can function only when it is built from above: thus Uzbekistan exists - not Baluchistan.
Bolivia, Borders, Colombia, Crime, Fight against crime and corruption, Justice, Latin America and the Caribbean, Networks, Peru, Politics / Political Systems, Poverty, State, Terrorism, Violence, Les études du CERI
Debt, Iran, Middle East, Networks, NGOs / Civil society, Political order, Politics / Political Systems, State, Les études du CERI
Borders, Identities, Japan, Networks, NGOs / Civil society, North-East Asia, State, Transnational, Les études du CERI
Central Africa, Crime, Identities, Networks, Political order, Republic of the Congo, State, Violence, Les études du CERI